Editorial Policy
Our commitment to unbiased, evidence-based peptide sourcing research.
Our Mission
WhereToFindPeptides is a research portal dedicated to providing educational information about peptide sourcing, quality assessment, and research methodologies. We are strictly educational - we do not sell peptides, endorse specific suppliers, or accept payment for coverage.
Editorial Independence
Our most important principle:
Zero Commercial Influence: We do not accept payments, commissions, or any form of compensation from peptide suppliers, manufacturers, or vendors. Our content is created solely for educational purposes without commercial bias.
Editorial Standards
Accuracy & Verification
- All sourcing information is verified through multiple channels
- Quality assessment criteria are based on industry standards
- Claims about testing methods are verified against lab capabilities
- Regulatory information is confirmed with official sources
Source Requirements
- Scientific Standards: USP, EP, and compendial standards
- Testing Information: HPLC, MS, and analytical method documentation
- Regulatory Sources: FDA, DEA, and international agency guidance
- Industry Standards: cGMP, ISO, and quality certifications
Content Creation Process
- Research Identification: Determine what sourcing questions need answers
- Information Gathering: Compile educational materials on sourcing practices
- Verification: Cross-check information with industry standards
- Content Development: Create clear, educational guides
- Review: Ensure accuracy and unbiased presentation
- Publication: Release with appropriate disclaimers
What We Don't Do
- We do not sell or distribute peptides
- We do not recommend specific suppliers or vendors
- We do not accept paid placements or advertising from suppliers
- We do not earn commissions or referral fees
- We do not provide sourcing advice for illegal purposes
How We Discuss Suppliers
When educational content requires discussing sourcing:
- We provide general criteria for evaluating suppliers
- We explain quality indicators (testing, certifications, etc.)
- We describe red flags and warning signs
- We do NOT recommend or endorse specific vendors
Our goal is to educate users on what to look for, not to direct them to specific sources.
Quality Assessment Criteria
When discussing quality evaluation, we focus on:
- Standard analytical testing methods (HPLC, MS)
- Certificate of Analysis (CoA) interpretation
- Manufacturing standards (cGMP compliance)
- Purity and contamination testing
- Storage and handling best practices
Legal & Regulatory Context
We provide educational information about:
- Research chemical regulations
- Import/export restrictions
- Research-use-only classifications
- Applicable laws and compliance requirements
Legal Disclaimer: Content is educational only. We do not provide legal advice. Users are responsible for understanding and complying with applicable laws in their jurisdiction.
Author Qualifications
Content is created by writers with backgrounds in:
- Analytical chemistry and laboratory science
- Pharmaceutical quality assurance
- Regulatory affairs and compliance
- Scientific research methodologies
Update Cadence
Sourcing information can change as regulations evolve and industry practices develop. We review content quarterly and update when significant changes occur in regulations, testing standards, or quality requirements.
Corrections Policy
If we discover an error or receive credible feedback about inaccuracies:
- We investigate immediately (sourcing accuracy is critical)
- Verified errors are corrected promptly
- Significant corrections are noted on affected pages
- We maintain transparency about changes
AI Assistant Policy
Our AI research assistant:
- Provides educational information based on our knowledge base
- Does not recommend specific suppliers or sources
- Does not provide legal or medical advice
- Maintains the same editorial standards as our written content
Contact Us
Have questions about our editorial standards? Found an error? Contact us at our contact page. We respond to editorial concerns within 48 hours.
Our Commitment
We believe access to unbiased, educational information about sourcing and quality assessment empowers researchers to make informed decisions. Our commitment is to remain completely independent and educational, without any commercial influence.